Georgia: Should juror's racial bias halt execution?

Georgia: Should juror's racial bias halt execution? - Hallo friendsSHARE IF THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR YOUR FRIENDS, In the article you read this time with the title Georgia: Should juror's racial bias halt execution?, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article business, Article health, Article latest, Article News, Article politics, Article property, Article tips, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : Georgia: Should juror's racial bias halt execution?
link : Georgia: Should juror's racial bias halt execution?

Read too


Georgia: Should juror's racial bias halt execution?

Jury box
Keith Tharpe faces the death penalty for killing his sister-in-law and kidnapping and raping his estranged wife. His lawyers have appealed the sentence because 1 of the jurors who voted for his execution may have been racially biased.

Keith Tharpe was convicted in 1991 of killing his sister-in-law and kidnapping and raping his estranged wife on Setp. 25, 1990. The wife left him and moved in with her parents. He intercepted her and her sister, Jacqueline Freeman, while they were on their way to work. He killed her sister, dragged her in a ditch and raped her and drove her to Macon to force her to withdraw money from her credit union account.

With only 100 days to prepare the case, Tharpe's defense team lost the trial. The jury unanimously sentenced him to death.

8 years later, claims of a racially bias juror surfaced. The man in question, Barney Gattie, admitted he used racial epithets and racially biased language when describing Tharpe. Now-deceased, Gattie's signed an affidavit for Tharpe's lawyers stating that. 

Two days later, he signed another affidavit for the state saying that he voted for Tharpe to receive the death penalty because he was a cold, calculated murderer, not because he was black.

Tharpe's lawyers filed new motions after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in March that courts can examine what happened in a jury room when there are showings that racial prejudice played a role in the deliberations.

U.S. District judge rejected the claims because 10 other jurors said there was no racial animus in their deliberations.

Tharpe's lawyers are now asking the 11th Circuit to consider the juror misconduct claim.

Source: Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Sept. 16, xxx, 2017


⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde


Thus Article Georgia: Should juror's racial bias halt execution?

That's an article Georgia: Should juror's racial bias halt execution? This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Georgia: Should juror's racial bias halt execution? with the link address https://ifthisisforyour.blogspot.com/2017/09/georgia-should-jurors-racial-bias-halt.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "Georgia: Should juror's racial bias halt execution?"

Post a Comment