Indonesia: Experts differ on revocation of blasphemy articles

Indonesia: Experts differ on revocation of blasphemy articles - Hallo friendsSHARE IF THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR YOUR FRIENDS, In the article you read this time with the title Indonesia: Experts differ on revocation of blasphemy articles, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings Article business, Article health, Article latest, Article News, Article politics, Article property, Article tips, We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : Indonesia: Experts differ on revocation of blasphemy articles
link : Indonesia: Experts differ on revocation of blasphemy articles

Read too


Indonesia: Experts differ on revocation of blasphemy articles

Former Jakarta Governor 'Ahok': Sentenced to two years for blasphemy
Former Jakarta Governor 'Ahok': Sentenced to two years for blasphemy
Legal experts are showing differences of opinion over the need to revoke the blasphemy articles in Indonesia’s penal code in a debate that has erupted after non-active Jakarta governor Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja Purnama was imprisoned recently for blasphemy.

Bivitri Susanti, a constitutional law expert from the Jakarta-based Jentera School of Law, said blasphemy articles, especially Article 156 (a) of the Criminal Code, were “problematic”.

“The parameters [of blasphemy] used in the article are not correct. It uses ‘public reaction’ as a parameter to define criminal aspects of alleged blasphemy, while in fact most criminal articles use ‘intention’ as a parameter,” Bivitri said as quoted by kompas.com on Friday.

Constitutional law expert Yusril Ihza Mahendra said blasphemy articles were still needed in Indonesia and the government needed to “protect all religions from any kind of insult”.

“For Indonesia, religion is fundamental. The forms of protection for religions can be found in criminal [blasphemy] articles,” he said in a statement made available to The Jakarta Post on Friday.

Yusril referred to a judicial review ruling at the Constitutional Court, which rejected an appeal to revoke the 1965 Blasphemy Law in 2009.

Blasphemy is regulated in Article 156 (a) of the Criminal Code, used by the court in Ahok’s case, and in the 1965 Blasphemy Law, formulated during former president Sukarno’s presidency.

Source: Jakarta Post, May 20, 2017

⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!


Thus Article Indonesia: Experts differ on revocation of blasphemy articles

That's an article Indonesia: Experts differ on revocation of blasphemy articles This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Indonesia: Experts differ on revocation of blasphemy articles with the link address https://ifthisisforyour.blogspot.com/2017/05/indonesia-experts-differ-on-revocation.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

Related Posts :

0 Response to "Indonesia: Experts differ on revocation of blasphemy articles"

Post a Comment